Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797408›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2026

Development and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Two-Step Model for Automated Serum Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories.

Weixin Chen, Yuxuan Xiong, Chenxi Zhang, Zhifang Sui, Fengning Yang, Zikun Ma, Qinglin Liu, Yuexin Cui, Ran Han

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weixin ChenSecond Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3782-1562
Yuxuan XiongSecond Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2305-8511
Chenxi ZhangRoche Diagnostics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3346-4926
Zhifang SuiRoche Diagnostics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2726-0242
Fengning YangThe Second High School Attached to Beijing Normal University, International Division School, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8686-9702
Zikun MaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6982-7387
Qinglin LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8611-0065
Yuexin CuiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-5061
Ran HanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2173-4693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhancing pre-analytical QC in clinical laboratories and providing risk alerts is crucial for ensuring accurate test results for patients whose samples are affected by hemolysis, icterus, or lipemia. We evaluated a novel, self-developed artificial intelligence (AI) approach for assessing serum quality using a two-step deep learning YOLOv5-ResNet-50 architecture model and explored its performance under real-world laboratory conditions. Methods: The performance of the two-step model prototype integrated into a Roche Cobas c 701 module (Roche Diagnostics, Shanghai, China) for preprocessing was assessed. By combining serum index testing with manual evaluation, we established a laboratory-specific model for automated sample quality identification. A primary dataset of 21,000 serum samples was partitioned into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%) for model development and tuning. Subsequently, a separate, independent test dataset of 21,000 samples was used to conduct the final, unbiased evaluation of the model's performance, with statistical analysis. Results: The AI serum model achieved recognition accuracies exceeding 97% for hemolysis and icterus and over 92% for lipemia. In human-machine comparisons, the AI model demonstrated higher consistency (72% exact agreement) than manual assessments (42%-68% exact agreement). Conclusions: The AI-powered serum quality software demonstrated high accuracy in preanalytical serum quality assessment, offering a performance that meets or exceeds that of both automated and manual measurements. This tool can enhance laboratory efficiency and reduce the error risks associated with subjective visual evaluations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLaboratories, ClinicalSerumDeep LearningHemolysisHumansQuality ControlArtificial intelligenceDeep learning systemPre-analytical sample qualitySerum classification software

Identifiers

PMID41797408
PMCPMC13458171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.