Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797373›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and applied biochemistry2026

Investigation of the Medical Image Modalities to Detect the Abnormalities in the Spinal Cord Using Thresholding Techniques.

Manjima Saha, Goldina Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and applied biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manjima SahaDepartment of Computer Application and Sciences, Institute of Engineering and Management, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.
Goldina GhoshDepartment of Computer Application and Sciences, Institute of Engineering and Management, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately segmenting spinal structures from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing degenerative disc diseases. However, 1.5 T low-field MRI often suffers from high noise and low contrast, complicating the segmentation process. This study provides a systematic comparative evaluation of four thresholding-based techniques: binary/global, Otsu, adaptive, and standard deviation-based methods. Using a dataset of spinal DICOM images, we analyzed the effectiveness of these algorithms in delineating bone and soft tissue boundaries. The performance was quantitatively validated using the Dice coefficient and statistical analysis via ANOVA. Results indicate that adaptive thresholding and Otsu thresholding outperformed global methods in handling localized intensity variations, achieving a higher similarity index to expert-validated reference masks. Statistical analysis using ANOVA (p > 0.05) further suggests that while these traditional methods are computationally efficient, their efficacy is constrained by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in low-field imaging. This research establishes a technical benchmark for traditional segmentation limits, highlighting the specific scenarios where a transition to deep-learning-based models becomes necessary for clinical accuracy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal CordHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioANOVA testDICOMMRIspinal cord deformationthresholding techniques

Identifiers

PMID41797373
PMCPMC13446441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.