Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797371›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2026

Valuing Australian parent preferences for community-based nutrition and physical activity initiatives: a discrete choice experiment.

Nicole Ward, Thao Thai, Melanie Nichols, Marj Moodie, Kim Robinson, Vicki Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole WardDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-2492
Thao ThaiHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-7509
Melanie NicholsGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-5899
Marj MoodieDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-5250
Kim RobinsonSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-3868
Vicki BrownDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2891-9476

Funding

National Health and Medical Research CouncilPRECIS: PRecison Evidence for Childhood obesity prevention InterventionS at Deakin University GNT2002234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parent engagement in community-based obesity prevention interventions (CBOPIs) enhances obesity prevention outcomes. Actions from CBOPIs may also have climate change-related impacts, but little is known about specific elements of CBOPIs that promote parental engagement, and whether parents prefer CBOPIs that aim to address obesity alone or obesity and climate change warrants further investigation. An unlabelled 12-choice task discrete choice experiment (DCE) was undertaken, using a D-efficient design and incorporating two CBOPI alternatives plus an opt-out alternative. CBOPIs were described by six attributes: cost, aim, involvement, effectiveness, convenience, and social opportunities. Attributes were informed by a literature review of enablers and barriers to parent participation. The survey was electronically distributed to parents of primary-school-aged children in each Australian state and territory during April-May 2024. Data were analysed using conditional logit models, and willingness-to-pay for attributes was estimated. Parents (n = 438) preferred less costly CBOPIs (P < .001) that aim to address both healthy lifestyles and climate change (P = .086). Parents preferred short-term, manageable disruptions to family schedules to accommodate CBOPI participation (P = <.001) over no intervention. They were willing to pay an additional $3.97 per fortnight (∼$104.000 per year) for CBOPI participation to be convenient (standard error 1.380, P = .004). Our findings suggest that parents preferred CBOPIs that aim to address both healthy lifestyles and climate change. This suggests that incorporating climate change action into CBOPIs may increase parent support and consequently support CBOPI outcomes for both obesity prevention and climate change action.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorExerciseHealth PromotionObesityParentsAdultAustraliaChildClimate ChangeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesclimate changecommunitydiscrete choice experimentobesity

Identifiers

PMID41797371
PMCPMC13017149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.