ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Cold hardiness dynamics predict budbreak and associated low-temperature threats in grapevine.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refreshing perspectives in a warming world: understanding the cold adaptation strategies of plants - an introduction to a Virtual Issue.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Warming Reduces Cold Hardiness of Boreal Plants but Damage Risk Varies by Species and Season.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Thresholds for spring freeze: measuring risk to improve predictions in a warming world.The New phytologist · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dormant buds of temperate woody perennial plants must attain cold hardiness to survive winters and timely lose it in spring to break bud while avoiding damage from low temperatures and late frosts. Therefore, we asked: Can a cold hardiness model be used to predict budbreak? Here, we used a previously published cold hardiness model to predict bud cold hardiness of three grapevine (Vitis spp.) varieties ('Cabernet-Sauvignon', 'Riesling', and 'Concord') from historical temperature records of eight locations in North America and Europe. Based on those predictions and thresholds of cold hardiness at budbreak from literature, budbreak date was extracted. Despite being untrained on budbreak data, the model resulted in good predictions (RMSE = 7.3d, n = 329), further improved based on expected delays from estimated cold damage (RMSE = 7.2d). Both increasing and decreasing freeze damage risk trends were predicted with increasing temperature, depending on the range of mean dormant season temperature (MDST; 1 Nov-30 Apr) in each location. Spring phenology predictions in relation to MDST also showed warming to advance (MDST < 10°C) or delay (MDST > 10°C) budbreak. Cold hardiness dynamics represent a key advancement in spring phenological modeling that provides information on low-temperature damage potential for the entire dormant season alongside improved predictions of budbreak timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.