ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2026
Evaluation of physical, chemical, and color-matching properties of monochromatic resin composites: An in vitro study.
Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of physicomechanical and optical properties of bioactive glass (BAG)-filled resin composites: anBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and color-matching ability of monochromatic resin composites: Palfique Omnichroma / Tokuyama (Mono1) and Vittra APS Unique / FGM (Mono2) compared with the conventional resin composite: Filtek Z250 XT / Solventum (Conv). For this analysis, ten disc-shaped composite specimens were prepared for each group for the microhardness, sorption, solubility, and color stability tests. To evaluate color-matching ability, 36 tooth specimens were obtained from the buccal/lingual surfaces of human molars (n = 12). The teeth were restored, and color compatibility was assessed with a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easy Shade) and visually. Microhardness and sorption were higher in the Conv group. However, sorption values are within the limits established by ISO 4049/2019 for all groups. No significant difference in solubility or visual color match was noted. However, the conv group demonstrated superior color-matching in the spectrophotometer analysis. After 7 days of coffee immersion, the Mono 1 group showed slightly less pigmentation. Monochromatic resin composites demonstrated physicochemical and organoleptic properties comparable to those of the evaluated conventional resin composites, suggesting similar compatibility and a potential option for simplifying clinical restorative protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.