ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Impact of prior olaparib use on subsequent platinum-based therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has the highest mortality among gynecologic malignancies, with frequent recurrences despite initial responsiveness to platinum. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, have improved progression-free survival in BRCA-mutated and homologous recombination-deficient EOC. However, emerging evidence suggests that prior exposure to PARP inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy, raising concerns about treatment sequencing. To evaluate whether prior olaparib use affects the sensitivity to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, and to explore potential predictive biomarkers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated between 2008 and 2024. Patients were divided into an olaparib group (n=22) and a control group (n=24) without prior PARP inhibitor use. The primary endpoint was the difference between progression-free survival interval after second- and first-line therapy (PFS2 and PFS1). Secondary endpoints included time to first subsequent therapy (TFST)-time to second subsequent therapy (TSST) and correlations of NLR and CA125 with PFS2-PFS1.
resultsThe olaparib group had a significantly shorter PFS2-PFS1 (mean 6.40 vs. 11.17 months, p=0.023). TFST-TSST was shorter in the olaparib group (7.73 vs. 11.46 months) but not statistically significant (p=0.156). NLR was inversely correlated with PFS2-PFS1, and was strongest at 4 months (r=-0.515) and 5 months (r=-0.624) post-treatment in the olaparib and control groups, respectively. CA125 showed no significant correlation.
conclusionOlaparib exposure may impair later chemotherapy efficacy. Careful treatment sequencing and biomarker development are warranted to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.