Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796703›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026

Oral JAK Inhibitors as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Refractory Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yu Peng, Mingzi Sun, Jiayu Chen, Xubo Huang, Fengchuan Zhang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu PengThe Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9592-1672
Mingzi SunThe Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiayu ChenThe Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xubo HuangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Fengchuan ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

National High Level Chinese Medicine Hospital Clinical Research Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRosacea is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis. While standard therapies exist, managing refractory subtypes remains a therapeutic challenge. Oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as potential alternatives, but systematic evidence is lacking.

aimsTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral JAK inhibitors for rosacea through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in five databases from inception to December 1, 2025. The primary outcome was the pooled clinical response rate. Secondary outcomes included the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

resultsEleven studies involving 57 patients were included. The overall pooled response rate was 89.9% (95% CI: 74.4%-99.4%), with low heterogeneity (I

conclusionsOral JAK inhibitors show promising potential as a therapeutic option for refractory rosacea. However, given the small sample size and single-arm design, these findings are exploratory. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to validate these findings and guide stratified treatment.

Indexed as

Janus Kinase InhibitorsRosaceaAdministration, OralHumansPiperidinesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPyrimidinestofacitinibAbrocitinibJAK inhibitorsmeta‐analysisrosaceaTofacitinibUpadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41796703
PMCPMC12968368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.