Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796435›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Day 14 Bone Marrow Biopsy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction: The End of Story or Not Yet?

Mostafa F Mohammed Saleh, Abdulrahman Nasiri, Ahmed Abdrabou, Ali Alahmari, Syed O Ahmed, Ayman Saad, Mahmoud Aljurf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mostafa F Mohammed SalehAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman NasiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-810X
Ahmed AbdrabouAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlahmariAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Syed O AhmedAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman SaadAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud AljurfAdult Hematology, HSCT and cellular therapy section, Oncology center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Day 14 bone marrow biopsy (D14 BMB) has historically been a key tool for early treatment response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly following intensive chemotherapy. Traditionally, a blast count of <5% at D14 is associated with higher complete remission (CR) rates and improved overall survival (OS), while persistent disease often prompts re-induction therapy. However, emerging evidence suggests that while re-induction may increase CR rates, it does not consistently improve OS and is associated with significant morbidity. With the emergence of venetoclax-based and other targeted therapies, the traditional role of D14 BMB is being reconsidered, as these agents exhibit slower response kinetics, making later assessments and measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring more reliable for treatment adaptation. This review critically examines the prognostic utility of D14 BMB in AML, its relevance across different treatment modalities, and its correlation with long-term outcomes. By synthesizing current evidence, we explore whether D14 BMB remains a valuable clinical tool or if a paradigm shift toward later assessments and MRD-guided decision-making is warranted in modern AML therapy.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiopsyHumansInduction ChemotherapyNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAMLDay 14 BMBinductionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41796435
PMCPMC12968402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.