Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796423›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026

Chronic pain and unrecognized grief: epistemic barriers to personal and social recognition.

Christopher Jude McCarroll, Ying-Tung Lin, Dominik Koesling, Claudia Bozzaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher Jude McCarrollInstitute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan. chrismccarroll@nycu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-1355
Ying-Tung LinInstitute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-7860
Dominik KoeslingInstitute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. dominik.koesling@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-6467
Claudia BozzaroInstitute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2480-7787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is it to grieve? What is the nature of grief? An intuitive and straightforward answer to these questions, one that will be familiar to all of us, is that grief is an emotional reaction to the death of a close loved one. Grief is intimately connected to bereavement. However, grief can arise in situations beyond the death of a significant other and is revealed to be a much more complex and heterogeneous experience. People can grieve over all sorts of losses. What makes our response to these losses one of grief? We can understand all these losses as involving a loss of life possibilities, which impacts one's practical identity and who one takes oneself to be. Importantly, a close examination of the phenomenology of chronic pain helps illuminate the ways in which it also involves the kind of losses that we can grieve over. The losses involved in experiences of chronic pain impact one's practical identity in ways that can lead to grief. This chronic pain grief remains largely unrecognized, however. We outline four epistemic barriers to recognizing the grief involved in experiences of chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainGriefAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansChronic painDepressionEpistemic barriersGriefLoss

Identifiers

PMID41796423
PMCPMC13086747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.