Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796415›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Incorporating Patient Perspectives into Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Drug Development Framework Recommendation.

Emuella Flood, Niklas Karlsson, Jennifer Ostridge, Bistra Kirova, Tim Sullivan, György Zörényi, Barbara Valastro, Jiyoon Park

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emuella FloodPatient Centered Science, BioPharmaceuticals Medical Evidence, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Niklas KarlssonPatient Centered Science, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jennifer OstridgeGlobal Patient Safety BioPharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bistra KirovaGlobal Patient Safety Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Tim SullivanGlobal Patient Safety BioPharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
György ZörényiGlobal Patient Safety Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Barbara ValastroR&D Patient Science, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jiyoon ParkPatient Safety Data & Analytics, AstraZeneca, 1 MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA. jiyoon.park1@astrazeneca.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory agencies have been promoting the incorporation of the patient perspective into benefit-risk assessment to better align regulatory decisions with patients' needs and priorities. Currently, benefit-risk assessments for regulatory submissions primarily capture the patient perspective through patient-reported outcome data from clinical trials. However, there is a push for a more systematic approach to capturing the patient perspective in benefit-risk assessment and decision-making throughout the drug development life cycle. Although different guidelines and frameworks have been developed, consensus on how to systematically incorporate the patient perspective into structured benefit-risk (sBR) assessment remains elusive. In 2023, Sullivan et al. published an sBR assessment framework that was developed to enhance systematic and collaborative decision-making throughout a drug life cycle. Here we propose how this sBR assessment framework could be expanded, committing to a patient-centered approach by considering the patient perspective at every step of drug development. These recommendations aim to put patients at the center of drug development, ultimately leading to better treatment outcomes and improved lives.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDecision MakingHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRisk AssessmentBenefit-risk assessmentDrug developmentFramework recommendationPatient experiencePatient perspectiveStructured benefit-risk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.