Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796404›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026

Evaluating the clinical use and safety of LumenEye in an outpatient colorectal clinic: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Rebecca Beni, H K Sekhon Inderjit Singh, H Harper, E Lozano, A Goede

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca BeniDepartment of Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2584-6603
H K Sekhon Inderjit SinghDepartment of Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK. Harpreet.sekhon@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-2933
H HarperDepartment of Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-5431-0775
E LozanoDepartment of Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
A GoedeDepartment of Surgery, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6722-5245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital rectoscopy may reduce demand on endoscopy units, particularly as part of a watch-and-wait (WAW) organ preservation strategy for rectal cancer. LumenEye is a digital rigid rectoscope offering high-resolution rectal visualisation, video streaming and biopsy capability without sedation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LumenEye in a novel outpatient colorectal clinic primarily managing WAW patients.

methodsA single centre, retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a LumenEye examination in this clinic between August 2023 and November 2024 was conducted. Demographic, procedural, referral and outcome data were collected from electronic health records. Descriptive statistics summarised findings, while chi-squared and logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with complications or early termination.

resultsA total of 327 procedures were performed; mean patient age was 67.6 years. Most procedures (54.1%, n = 177) were for WAW patients, with 52.6% of referrals originating from the colorectal multidisciplinary team. LumenEye was generally well tolerated: pain requiring analgesia occurred in 5.8% (n = 19), early termination in 2.1% (n = 7) and minor bleeding in 1.2% (n = 4). No perforations or infections occurred. One local cancer recurrence (0.3%) was missed and subsequently identified on flexible sigmoidoscopy 3 months later. Pain and bleeding were significant predictors of early termination (p < 0.001).

conclusionsLumenEye is a safe and practical tool for outpatient rectal examination including patients with rectal cancer undergoing WAW organ preservation strategy. Its minimal support requirements and favourable safety profile suggest that it may be a valuable alternative to traditional endoscopy, particularly in settings where access is limited.

Indexed as

Digital Rectal ExaminationRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectumRetrospective StudiesDigital rectoscopyFlexible sigmoidoscopyLumenEyeRectal cancerWatch-and-wait

Identifiers

PMID41796404
PMCPMC12979350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.