ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conversion between the Brief assessment of Impaired Cognition, Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination in a mixed clinical sample.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrief and accurate tools are needed to enhance the prompt identification of cognitive disorders. This study aimed to translate and adapt two recently developed, highly accurate instruments into Italian: the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC) and the BASIC Questionnaire (BASIC-Q), and to validate their diagnostic accuracy.
methodsThe Italian versions of BASIC and BASIC-Q were developed following a rigorous process and were validated in patient populations referred to two Italian tertiary memory clinics. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative validity of BASIC and BASIC-Q in identifying cognitive impairment compared to specialist diagnoses. Linear regression models were used to explore the influence of traditional confounders, such as age and education.
resultsA total of 246 participants were recruited for the study. The BASIC and BASIC-Q assessments accurately distinguished between individuals with cognitive impairment and those with intact cognition, achieving areas under the curve of 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. The accuracy of these two tools was comparable to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Additionally, both instruments showed a negative association with age but were not influenced by educational level. DISCUSSION: The BASIC and BASIC-Q tools effectively identify older individuals with cognitive impairment who may need further diagnostic assessment. Their accuracy must be explored in primary care settings and among multicultural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.