Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796373›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026

Hybrid metabolic engineering enables xylose-driven co-production of polyhydroxybutyrate and violacein in Escherichia coli.

Khoi Nhat Pham, Eun Yeol Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khoi Nhat PhamDepartment of Chemical Engineering (BK21 FOUR Integrated Engineering), Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17104, Republic of Korea.
Eun Yeol LeeDepartment of Chemical Engineering (BK21 FOUR Integrated Engineering), Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17104, Republic of Korea. eunylee@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea government (MSIT) RS-2024-00466473Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) RS-2023-00265608 & 1415188462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin lignocellulosic biomass, xylose is the second most abundant sugar after glucose. As a renewable and sustainable substrate, it is gaining attention as a feedstock for microbial bioprocesses. In this study, we demonstrated the co-production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and violacein from xylose. We initially confirmed the feasibility of co-production through genome-scale metabolic simulations, followed by optimization using a hybrid expression system that combines a conventional tac promoter and synthetic promoter-ribosome-binding site-terminator (semi-endo PRT) elements in dual plasmids. Additionally, we assessed the antimicrobial activity of violacein against type I methanotrophs.

resultsRecombinant Escherichia coli DH5α harboring a hybrid system produced 111.3 ± 19.7 and 0.88 ± 0.23 mg/L of PHB and violacein, respectively, in M9 using xylose as the sole carbon source, without tryptophan supplementation. Using the synthetic PRT system, 528.9 ± 104 mg/g dry cell weight (DCW) of PHB was obtained. Additionally, violacein inhibits the growth of Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z at 9 µg/mL in nitrate mineral salt medium containing methanol as the sole carbon source.

conclusionsThe use of lignocellulose-derived sugars for co-production offers an environmentally sustainable bio-manufacturing approach that contributes to greenhouse gas mitigation and supports the transition toward a circular bioeconomy.

Indexed as

Co-productionE. coliLignocellulosic xyloseMethanotrophPolyhydroxybutyrateViolacein

Identifiers

PMID41796373
PMCPMC13081634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.