ArticleBMC health services research2026
Assessing the association between the domains of the Atlas Context Assessment and implementation outcomes of the TeamBirth project: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe know context matters for successful implementation, but few studies have shown which contextual areas are most influential to implementation outcomes. The Atlas Context Assessment was designed to collect context data and use it to inform the design of appropriate implementation strategies.
methodsThis cross-sectional study examines the association between organizational context and implementation of a birthing hospital intervention across 23 hospitals in Oklahoma. The study assessed organizational context with the Atlas Context Assessment prior to implementation of the TeamBirth intervention. The analysis estimates the association between specific contextual factors at baseline and the odds of a patient participating in a TeamBirth huddle (during labor and delivery or postpartum). The association was tested by conducting a logistic regression analysis with hospital-level Atlas scores that predict the odds of a patient participating in a huddle, while controlling for multiple covariates.
resultsThe study identified significant associations between four out of five of the organizational context domains and the odds of participating in a TeamBirth huddle during labor and delivery. Specifically, the ability to implement (aOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.04–4.94), the strength of the implementation team (aOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.37–6.10), commitment and motivation (aOR = 6.38, 95% CI: 2.38–14.38), and the internal culture (aOR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.22–13.07) domains were all significantly associated with adoption of the TeamBirth huddles during labor and delivery. Participating in a TeamBirth huddle in the postpartum setting was significantly associated with three out of five Atlas domains (Implementation Team, Commitment and Motivation, and Internal Culture).
conclusionsThese findings underscore the critical role of organizational-level contextual factors in determining the implementation success of the TeamBirth project. The application of the Atlas Context Assessment provided valuable insights into which domains, specific barriers and facilitators most influence implementation outcomes. By enabling sites to strategically target these contextual elements, the tool supports the efforts to create a more conducive environment for effective implementation. This study establishes a foundation for future research aimed at optimizing contextual determinants to enhance the adoption and success of healthcare interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.