ArticleHead & face medicine2026
Automatic estimation of single-tooth width from standardized two-dimensional occlusal photographs using deep learning.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithmic Performance to Clinical Translation: Translational Readiness of Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a deep learning-based fully automated model for estimating the mesiodistal width of teeth in standardized occlusal photographs, enabling accurate and efficient assessment of individual tooth dimensions.
methodsThe dataset comprised 14,403 teeth, including 12,079 teeth from an internal dataset and 2,328 teeth from an independent external test set. Clinically obtained mesiodistal crown widths derived from three-dimensional (3D) intraoral scans served as reference values. Corresponding mesial and distal keypoints were annotated on two-dimensional (2D) intraoral photographs. A two-stage deep learning framework was developed, consisting of tooth keypoint detection followed by a depth-informed regression model to estimate mesiodistal crown widths. Model performance was evaluated using key metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²).
resultsThe deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy across 12,079 teeth: MAE = 0.34 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33–0.34); RMSE = 0.44 mm; R² = 0.94. External validation on 2,328 independent teeth demonstrated consistent performance (MAE = 0.33 mm, RMSE = 0.42 mm).
conclusionsOur deep learning approach reliably estimates mesiodistal crown widths from standardized occlusal photographs, demonstrating strong agreement with 3D intraoral scan reference measurements and good clinical reproducibility across independent datasets within the same standardized workflow. Future studies will further investigate its robustness across heterogeneous imaging devices and acquisition conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.