Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796325›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Mind the gap: a nationwide survey study of undergraduate medical communication curricula in Italy.

Roberta Martina Zagarella, Sarah Bigi, Melissa Nava, Chiara Midea, Sibilla Parlato, Serena Barello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberta Martina Zagarella *Interdepartmental Center for Research Ethics and Integrity, National Research Council, Via dei Taurini 19, Rome, 00185, Italy. roberta.zagarella@cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-2451
Sarah Bigi *Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-6140
Melissa NavaDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Chiara MideaDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5544-7651
Sibilla ParlatoDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4581-3107
Serena BarelloWHYpsy Lab, Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-2563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective clinical communication is essential to safe, patient-centered care, yet its integration into undergraduate medical curricula remains inconsistent worldwide. In Italy, no national-level evidence has been available to guide reform in line with local specificities. This study aimed to systematically map and analyze healthcare communication education in Italian medical and health professions programs, identifying strengths, gaps, and opportunities for innovation.

methodsThe ComMedInItaly study adopted a two-phase design: (1) systematic mapping of undergraduate healthcare communication courses across accredited Italian universities; and (2) a national survey of course instructors exploring content, pedagogical approaches, assessment methods, and instructor expertise. Findings from both phases were descriptively analyzed and integrated.

resultsTwenty-four courses were identified, most positioned in the early years of study, assigned limited credits, and often embedded in psychology modules. Teaching was predominantly lecture-based, with limited use of experiential learning or performance-based assessment. Course content emphasized relational and psychological aspects, while interactional and linguistic dimensions were underrepresented. Instructor profiles were heterogeneous, with few affiliations to professional societies in healthcare communication.

conclusionsHealthcare communication training in Italy is fragmented, under-resourced, and weakly connected to clinical practice. This is the first national-level analysis of communication education in Italy, establishing an empirical baseline for reform. The study introduces a replicable two-phase model, demonstrates the need for locally generated and culturally responsive evidence, and offers a pathway for aligning international frameworks with national realities. Together, these innovations position communication as a core, measurable competency in medical education.

Indexed as

CommunicationCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansItalyPatient-Centered CareSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical communication educationCulturally adaptive trainingCurriculum mappingHealthcare communicationItalyMedical curriculaPatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID41796325
PMCPMC13081256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.