ArticleScientific reports2026
Identifying key gait features in stroke patients using wearable inertial sensors and supervised and unsupervised machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a major cause of motor disability, degrading walking and quality of life. Wearable gait analysis with magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) can quantify post-stroke impairments. We used machine learning to identify discriminative gait features in stroke, coupling supervised feature selection with unsupervised clustering to improve interpretability and generalizability. Eighty-five stroke patients and 97 healthy controls completed 10-Meter Walk Tests while wearing five MIMUs. Feature selection spanned spatiotemporal, symmetry, stability, and smoothness metrics. K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees (TREE) were trained, validated, and tested iteratively across data splits; clustering then verified discriminative ability. Sequential backward feature selection retained nine features, yielding accuracies (healthy vs. patient) of 94.1% (KNN), 96.7% (SVM), and 89.1% (TREE). SVM generalized best. Unsupervised k-medoids with cosine distance confirmed discrimination, reaching 90% accuracy with only three features: stride speed, stance-phase coefficient of variation, and medio-lateral harmonic ratio. Results indicate that gait variability, trunk smoothness, and upper-body stability robustly characterize post-stroke dysfunctions. Notably, head-movement smoothness emerged as a novel, discriminative feature. This integrated framework shows how wearable sensors plus machine learning can support clinical gait analysis and rehabilitation planning. Future work should enable real-time deployment and broaden datasets to cover more clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.