ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatially distributed wettability characterization in porous media.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterogeneous Wettability Alters Methane Migration and Leakage in Shallow Aquifers.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiphase displacement in porous media is governed by local wetting, yet its spatial variability in situ remains difficult to quantify. In micro-CT imaging, wettability is characterized by a geometric contact angle, but estimating contact angles is challenging since the three-phase contact loop is difficult to identify due to partial-volume effects and uncertainty in the segmentation. Existing methods cannot reliably resolve pore-scale heterogeneity in wettability. We introduce a novel automated geometric algorithm to measure the contact angle pore-by-pore contact angle that bypasses explicit detection of the contact loop by extrapolating surface normals from neighboring two-phase interfaces, reducing sensitivity to segmentation errors. The method is validated on synthetic datasets and applied to water-wet and mixed-wet rocks. We quantify measurement uncertainty arising from mesh smoothing and segmentation, and show that smaller pores amplify uncertainty. Wettability heterogeneity broadens the contact angle distribution because local wetting varies across the pore space. Our workflow produces spatially resolved contact angle maps that reveal heterogeneity masked by bulk averages; in a mixed-wet sample with a mean contact angle of 64.7°-conventionally classified as weakly water-wet-40% of pore space lies in the intermediate-wetting regime (70-110°), explaining the coexistence of minimal interfaces and mixed filling mechanisms. Open-source software is also provided enabling accurate wettability characterization for CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.