ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictability comparison of central corneal thickness reduction in myopic eyes with or without astigmatism undergoing FS-LASIK with two profiles of MEL 90.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare the predictability of central corneal thickness (CCT) reduction in myopic patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) using the aberration-optimized (Triple-A) and topography-guided (TG) profiles on the MEL 90 platform. This study involved 82 patients, treating one eye with the Triple-A profile and the other with the TG profile on the MEL 90, with an average spherical equivalent of - 5.76 ± 2.02 D (Triple-A) and - 5.79 ± 1.90 D (TG). Refractive assessments were done preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Achieved CCT reduction (via Pentacam) = CCT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.