Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796182›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

PS-SNN: pattern separation learning for expandable spiking neural networks in class-incremental learning.

Ke Hu, Liangsheng Wen, Tingting Zhang, Hao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ke HuChina Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, 100053, China. huke@chinamobile.com.
Liangsheng WenChina Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, 100053, China.
Tingting ZhangChina Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, 100053, China.
Hao ZhangChina Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, 100053, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological brains mitigate interference by orthogonalizing neural representations of similar memories, thereby preserving stability across tasks in continual learning. However, most existing continual learning approaches for spiking neural networks (SNNs) adopt randomly initialized classifier heads at each step and optimize them with imbalanced data, which often induces representation drift and undermines model stability. In this work, we revisit the role of the classifier head in the continual learning paradigm and propose a pattern separation learning strategy for expandable SNNs in class-incremental learning (CIL). Specifically, we predefine fixed and mutually orthogonal class centers for each class to replace the conventional learnable classifiers, providing stable optimization targets that prevent feature space conflicts and reduce interference between tasks. Combined with dynamically expandable structures that emulate neurogenesis to enhance plasticity, our approach effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting while maintaining adaptability to novel tasks. Experimental results show that our PS-SNN achieves an average incremental accuracy of 76.42% on the CIFAR100-B0 benchmark over 10 incremental steps. PS-SNN not only surpasses state-of-the-art SNN-based continual learning algorithms but also matches the performance of DNN-based methods, highlighting the potential of integrating biologically inspired pattern separation into neuromorphic computing systems.

Identifiers

PMID41796182
PMCPMC13086834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.