ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-objective optimization of a regional biogas supply chain using organic waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomass to bio-CNG from sorghum varieties for biogas production, energy recovery, and emission mitigation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing volume of agricultural and municipal organic residues presents both a waste-management challenge and an opportunity for low-carbon energy production. This study develops a multi-objective optimization model to support the strategic design of regional biogas supply chains, explicitly accounting for economic, environmental, and system-resilience criteria. The framework is demonstrated using data from a representative biogas plant case study to explore alternative system configurations and trade-offs among total cost, greenhouse gas emissions, energy revenue, resource consumption, and supply reliability. Results indicate that moderate investment levels allow substantial emission reductions, whereas beyond a certain threshold additional expenditure yields progressively smaller environmental benefits. Likewise, increasing plant throughput raises energy revenue, but the incremental financial return declines as capacity limits are approached. Sensitivity analysis shows that feedstock price and biogas yield have the strongest influence on overall system performance, while discount rate and transport-related emissions exert secondary effects. More balanced sourcing from multiple suppliers improves resilience and can enable further emission reductions without increasing capital cost. The proposed framework provides a transparent decision-support tool for designing economically viable and environmentally balanced biogas systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.