ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparing placement and polarity configurations of a two-magnet fingertip vibrotactile device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vibrotactile feedback enriches the use of wearable technologies for entertainment, navigation, and healthcare. The actuators of these portable systems, particularly fingertip devices, need to be compact, comfortable, and easy to integrate. Multiple vibrating elements could enhance perceptual realism, but how should they be arranged and oriented on the fingerpad? Here, we evaluate a simple approach that uses an audio input signal to drive an air coil that vibrates two magnets embedded in a soft fingertip sheath; the magnets are arranged in the radial-ulnar or proximal-distal direction with either the same or opposite polarity. We explore the effects of these new device configurations on both dynamic response and haptic perception. Experimental results indicate that the vibrations were perceived well across frequencies, with stronger sensations between 180 and 360 Hz, which aligns with the high vibration magnitudes our computational simulation predicts in this frequency range. Interestingly, perceptual responses showed that participants mainly classified vibrations based on the excitation frequency rather than the polarity of the magnets. Participants also rated vibrotactile feedback derived from recorded sounds and replayed for different interactions. Their evaluations offer promising evidence that this actuation approach could be used in extended-reality applications to improve transient user interactions with virtual objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.