ArticleScientific reports2026
Different strategies of bipeds and quadrupeds to maintain postural stability- a comparison of healthy humans and dogs via static posturography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Axis-dependent relationships and agreement between whole-body and limb-specific center of pressure measurements in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postural stability (PS) is the ability to maintain balance through the integration of sensory inputs from the proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular systems. This study compared PS between healthy adult humans and dogs using static posturography and investigated the effect of blindfolding on PS. Twenty-two healthy young adults and twenty-two healthy young pet dogs were assessed using a pressure measurement platform under eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The Romberg indices of 5 center of pressure (COP) parameters were calculated: mediolateral displacement (RI MLD%), craniocaudal/anteroposterior displacement (RI CCD%), COP length (RI L%), average speed (RI AS), and support surface (RI SS%). Significant differences were observed between humans and dogs for RI CCD%, RI L%, and RI AS. Humans exhibited greater reliance on visual input for balance, indicated by higher RI values for these parameters, suggesting increased instability when blindfolded. In contrast, dogs showed lower RI values, indicating less reliance on vision and more stable postural control. The lack of significant differences in RI MLD% and RI SS% suggests similar mediolateral and support surface compensatory mechanisms between species. These findings reveal fundamental mechanistic differences in how balance is maintained between the two species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.