ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of short-duration microwave treatments on flower development and secondary metabolite production in Agastache rugosa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of short-duration microwave (MW) exposure on growth, photosynthesis, antioxidant activity, and secondary metabolite accumulation in Agastache rugosa cultivated in a deep flow technique hydroponic system. Plants at 14 and 18 days after transplanting were exposed to MW radiation at 200 W for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 s, with untreated plants serving as the control. While most vegetative growth parameters were unaffected, MW exposure for 15–25 s significantly increased flower branch number by 9–15% and flower biomass by 9–24% compared with the control. These treatments also enhanced net photosynthetic rate (by up to 53%), chlorophyll a content (by 12%), and total phenolics (by 43–85%) compared with the control. Antioxidant enzyme activities were markedly elevated, with SOD, POD, and CAT increasing by up to 66%, 49%, and 103%, respectively. MW exposure also promoted phytochemical accumulation: total flavonoids increased by 7–11%, and key bioactive compounds such as chlorogenic acid (up to 7.3-fold), tilianin (up to 53%), and rosmarinic acid (up to 42%) were significantly enhanced. These results indicate that short MW exposures of 15–25 s act as an effective elicitation strategy to improve flower development and phytopharmaceutical quality of A. rugosa under controlled cultivation conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.