ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive multi-feature fusion architecture with optimized learning for high-fidelity brain tumor classification in MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain gliomas represent one of the most aggressive cancers worldwide and remain difficult to diagnose accurately at an early stage. Although computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) approaches have progressed notably in recent years, distinguishing between high-grade glioma (HG-G), low-grade glioma (LG-G), and healthy brain tissue on magnetic resonance images is still a major challenge. To address this issue, we propose a multi-stage framework designed to push the boundaries of current classification methods. The framework begins with a preprocessing phase that integrates Adaptive Gamma Correction (AGC) for improved contrast adjustment with a Denoising Convolutional Neural Network (DnCNN) for noise removal. Feature extraction is then carried out from three representative layers across three fine-tuned transfer learning CNNs (TRCNNs), where each model is optimized by a different algorithm. These deep representations are combined with handcrafted texture measures based on the Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), producing nine unique CNN-GLCM Fused Feature (CGFF) sets. The resulting hybrid descriptors are evaluated using several strong classifiers such as Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), along with a stacked ensemble to reinforce stability and robustness. Performance significance was verified through the Friedman statistical test, with p < 0.05, confirming the reliability of the improvements. The framework achieved 99.05% accuracy, 98.99% recall, 99.52% specificity, 99.08% positive predictive value (PPV), and 99.54% negative predictive value (NPV), consistently surpassed state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods across all reported metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.