ArticleScientific reports2026
Selective clearance of monoclonal antibodies via the mannose receptor is dependent on glycan pairing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are influenced by N-glycosylation, a critical quality attribute (CQA) that affects serum half-life and receptor interactions. High-mannose N-glycans are known to accelerate mAb clearance, likely via the mannose receptor (MR). However, the impact of high-mannose glycan pairing - whether symmetrical or asymmetrical - on this process remains poorly understood. MAbs enriched in high-mannose N-glycans were fractionated using mannose receptor—affinity chromatography to isolate symmetrical and asymmetrical high-mannose glyco-pairs. These fractions were characterized for physicochemical properties and labeled for a cell-based internalization assay using MR-expressing SUP-B15 cells to quantify internalization rates via flow cytometry. A PK study in rats was conducted using a high-mannose enriched mAb drug product, and glyco-pair-specific clearance was analyzed by mass spectrometry following immunocapture. Symmetrical high-mannose glyco-pair exhibited the highest internalization rate in vitro, followed by asymmetrical high-mannose and symmetrical complex glyco-pairs. In vivo, symmetrical high-mannose glyco-pair showed the fastest clearance, with a half-life of 2.4 days, compared to 7.2 days for asymmetrical high-mannose and 17.4 days for symmetrical complex glyco-pairs. The area under the curve was reduced to 73% and 38% for asymmetrical and symmetrical high-mannose glyco-pairs, respectively, relative to the symmetrical complex glyco-pair. These differences were attributed solely to glycan pairing, as other physicochemical properties remained consistent across fractions. Competitive inhibition with mannan confirmed MR-mediated uptake in vitro. The findings also suggest potential implications for immunogenicity, as increased internalization by antigen-presenting cells may enhance antigen presentation and anti-drug antibody formation. This study demonstrates that glycan pairing significantly influences the PK of mAbs by correlating with differential MR interactions, providing evidence for MR-mediated faster clearance of high-mannose containing mAbs. Symmetrical high-mannose glyco-pair are cleared more rapidly than asymmetrical counterparts, underscoring the need to consider glycan pairing as a distinct CQA. Current control strategies based solely on released N-glycans may overlook clinically relevant heterogeneity. Incorporating high-mannose glyco-pair analysis into manufacturing and quality control processes could improve therapeutic consistency and reduce immunogenicity risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.