ArticleScientific reports2026
An enhanced connected banking system optimizer with multiple strategies for numerical optimization problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Connected Banking System Optimizer (CBSO) is a recently proposed meta-heuristic inspired by inter-bank financial transactions. Owing to its parameter-free nature, it has shown competitive performance on engineering constrained optimization problems. Nevertheless, the CBSO algorithm still suffers from limited inter-population information exchange and an insufficiently smooth transition between exploitation and exploration, which often leads to premature convergence due to inadequate coverage of the search space. To address these shortcomings, this paper presents an enhanced variant called ECBSO that integrates a feedback selection strategy, a regenerative population strategy, and a distribution estimation strategy. Comprehensive experiments were conducted on the CEC-2017 benchmark suite to evaluate ECBSO, encompassing parameter sensitivity analysis, ablation studies, and comparisons with various advanced variants. Statistical validation was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Friedman test, and Nemenyi post-hoc test to confirm ECBSO's superiority over competing algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that ECBSO possesses high optimization efficacy and robustness, achieving average Friedman ranks of 2.103 (10D), 1.586 (30D), 1.828 (50D), and 2.103 (100D). Finally, ECBSO was applied to ten real-world engineering constrained optimization problems. The outcomes show that it not only solves practical problems effectively but also maintains remarkable stability, establishing ECBSO as an outstanding meta-heuristic variant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.