Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796093›Full record

ReviewThe Medical journal of Australia2026

Supporting Population Mental Health in the Wake of Mass Tragedies.

Susan J Rees, Derrick M Silove

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susan J ReesUNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2845-6547
Derrick M SiloveUNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bondi Beach terrorist attack has caused widespread community distress resulting in complex psychosocial challenges that require urgent attention to protect population mental health. Acute reactions including shock, fear and anger are normative, while the psychological responses unfolding over time may vary from adaptive to dysfunctional. A range of mental health and psychosocial services have been mobilised to address acute needs; however, to ensure a sustained and coherent framework of care, interventions should be guided by a set of principles that accurately respond to the unique nature of the event. We provide an overview of the Adaptation and Development After Persecution and Trauma (ADAPT) model as an overarching framework that can guide psychosocial interventions and promote adaptive coping, recovery and resilience.

Indexed as

Mental HealthStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTerrorismAdaptation, PsychologicalAustraliaCoping SkillsHumanscommunity psychiatrypost‐traumatic stress disordertrauma and stressor related disorders

Identifiers

PMID41796093
PMCPMC12968118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.