ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Computed Tomography Yield and Predictors of Pulmonary Embolism in Mechanically Ventilated Patients-A Retrospective Study.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe reported prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) detected during intensive care varies substantially. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the diagnostic reference method, but assessing pre-test probability and finding distinct indications for CTPA from clinical observations is difficult in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
aimsTo describe the rate of positive diagnostic outcome (yield) from CTPA exams performed on PE suspicion and to identify predictors in the free text motivational reasons from the referring clinician and among selected patient variables during intensive care for other conditions.
methodsCTPA exams and reports in adult, mechanically ventilated patients referred from two intensive care units during a 5-year period were compared to the radiology order content and to data collected from medical records. The association between a positive exam and five arbitrarily defined reasons for ordering the exam as well as selected patient variables was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsAmong 1113 thoracic computed tomography exams, 243 were CTPA ordered on clinical PE suspicion, yielding 52 (21% [95% CI: 17-26]) positives. Reasons "Elevated D-dimer" and "Undefined clinical suspicion" were significantly associated with a positive exam. However, none of the selected patient variables was significantly associated with a CTPA finding of PE.
conclusionThe diagnostic yield of clinical CTPA exams for suspected PE in mechanically ventilated patients fell within a range commonly cited for suspected acute PE in emergency department populations, but its association with clinical signs described in the CTPA order and with selected patient variables was low. EDITORIAL COMMENT: The report describes a single center experience, including 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, with computed tomography pulmonary angiography performed to evaluate suspected pulmonary embolism in mechanically ventilated ICU cases. An elevated D-dimer as well as high degree of clinical suspicion were associated with a positive pulmonary embolism finding on the radiological examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.