Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41795821›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

'Sweating Blood': Patients' Dirty Work in Informal Complaint Biographies.

Jelmer Brüggemann, Lisa Guntram, Ann-Charlotte Nedlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jelmer BrüggemannDepartment of Thematic Studies-Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1514-677X
Lisa GuntramDepartment of Thematic Studies-Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8344-0308
Ann-Charlotte NedlundDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-4536

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2020-01594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every day patients make informal complaints directly to care professionals. Although common in care encounters, the practice remains understudied. In this study, we focus on informal complaints through an analysis of interviews with 19 patients in Sweden, many living with chronic illness. We conceptualise these complaints as 'informal complaint biographies': not merely verbal expressions, but interwoven with people's lives, identities and care trajectories. As a lens through which to examine informal complaining, this study investigates 'dirty work': work that is considered a nuisance or even humiliating. We identify three different kinds of dirty work. 'Disgusting' refers to work with physical dirt entangled with the complaint. 'Drudging' describes patients' persistence, their effort to make healthcare function. Finally, 'disrupting' characterises work that challenges expertise from a vulnerable position. Our analysis shows how informal complaining can involve various types of undignifying work that cannot be separated from the complaint itself. By including work done by others than the traditional 'worker', namely patients, this study expands scholarship on dirty work. The study calls attention to how dirty work is shaped by systemic inefficiencies in healthcare and contributes new perspectives to complaints, research and policy, which is often wiped clean from any kind of dirt.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSweden

Identifiers

PMID41795821
PMCPMC12967771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.