ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
The relationship between Indigenous health and relevant sector Standards in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada: a scoping review.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth sector Standards in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada increasingly acknowledge the importance of culturally appropriate care for Indigenous populations. Despite this, inequities persist. This review explores how national health Standards intersect with Indigenous health, focusing on Cultural Safety, Indigenous-led governance, Indigenous knowledge, and anti-racism.
methodsA scoping review methodology was employed to map the breadth of literature across Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada. Guided by a six-stage framework and the PRISMA-ScR protocol, the review used the qualitative variant-Population/Problem, Interest, Context approach-to structure inclusion criteria and search strategies. Literature was sourced from five major databases and supplemented by grey literature. Data from 36 records were charted, synthesized, and analysed through narrative synthesis and stakeholder engagement.
resultsCultural Safety was consistently identified as more impactful than cultural competency alone, yet most Standards fall short of indicating how Cultural Safety will be measured. Across records, 75% highlighted the need to address social determinants of health, and 67% advocated anti-racism and structural reform. Indigenous-led governance and self-determination were linked to improved health outcomes in 50% of the records, though practical implementation was uneven. Integration of Indigenous knowledge and holistic approaches was supported in 47% of records, but limited by weak policy infrastructure. Racism, both systemic and interpersonal, was identified in all studies as a persistent barrier to equity. National Standards often lack the enforcement mechanisms to address these issues meaningfully.
conclusionThis review identified significant gaps between the intent and implementation of health sector Standards across Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada in relation to Indigenous health. Despite formal commitments to culturally appropriate care, systemic barriers, rooted in colonization and policy-practice disconnects, continue to undermine equitable outcomes. The findings highlight the need for Indigenous-led evaluation, stronger accountability, and the embedding of Cultural Safety, Indigenous leadership, and holistic health approaches to drive meaningful and lasting change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.