Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41795812›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Participation Beyond Compliance: Who Tried to Influence Other People's Vaccination Behaviour During the COVID-19 Crisis?

Hugo Touzet, Benoît Giry, Jeremy K Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hugo TouzetUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Benoît GirySciences Po Rennes - Arènes (UMR CNRS 6051), Rennes, France.
Jeremy K WardUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Inserm, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3389-6870

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-COVI-0035-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE36-0015-01ANRS-MIE 0344ANRS-MIE CAPNET,projectICOVAC-France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we call for more attention to be paid to what we call ordinary contributions to public health policies: the propensity of ordinary citizens to actively influence others to follow or reject a health policy. Shifting the focus from personal compliance to active participation (i.e., ordinary contribution) raises distinct questions pertaining to self-empowerment, personal network composition and the public denunciation of antivaccinationism. We draw on a survey conducted during the summer of 2022 among a representative sample of the French public (n = 4004) to understand what made some people try to bear on other people's behaviours regarding COVID-19 vaccination. We asked respondents whether they tried to convince people in their various social circles to get vaccinated or to not get vaccinated. We found that a significant share of French people-especially the most vaccine-hesitant-kept their opinions to themselves. Controlling for vaccine hesitancy and concern regarding COVID-19, the propensity to engage in ordinary contributions was heavily influenced by relationship to politics. We discuss the overlapping between political competence and health literacy and the tensions that can arise in everyday discussions of issues at the interface of health and politics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdultAgedFemaleFranceHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoliticsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 Vaccinesconflict avoidanceCOVID‐19participationpoliticisationvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41795812
PMCPMC12967758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.