Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41795786›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2026

Characterizing electroencephalogram dynamics during sedation withdrawal: Insights into cortical recovery following status epilepticus.

Mathieu Dhoisne, Philippe Derambure, Arnaud Delval, Saad Nseir, Nacim Betrouni, Romain Tortuyaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathieu DhoisneDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-1088
Philippe DerambureDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-5674
Arnaud DelvalDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-3541
Saad NseirIntensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-0357
Nacim BetrouniINSERM U1172, LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille University, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-5502
Romain TortuyauxDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-6023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCharacterize electroencephalogram (EEG) dynamics during propofol withdrawal in patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) and explore their association with functional outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with GCSE who received continuous EEG monitoring and propofol sedation. EEG data were analyzed during two predefined periods: during sedation (0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h) and 4 h after complete sedation withdrawal. Preprocessed EEG signals underwent spectral and complexity analyses, including relative spectral power across frequency bands, alpha-delta ratio, median frequency (MF), spectral edge frequency 85% (SEF85), and sample entropy. Principal component analysis was applied to EEG trajectory vectors for dimensionality reduction; hierarchical clustering was used to identify distinct evolution patterns during sedation withdrawal. Associations between EEG patterns, SE duration, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

resultsTwenty-one patients were included. At the population level, EEG features shifted toward faster and more complex activity after sedation withdrawal, with decreased delta power, increased theta, alpha, and beta power, and greater signal complexity. Clustering analysis identified two distinct EEG trajectories: one subgroup (24%) showed marked recovery of cortical dynamics with significant increases in frequency metrics and entropy, while the other (76%) demonstrated minimal changes, with persistent delta-band dominance and low complexity. Longer SE duration was significantly associated with the minimal-change group (p = 0.007). No significant differences in functional outcomes were observed between groups. SIGNIFICANCE: EEG dynamics during propofol withdrawal in patients with GCSE evolve along distinct trajectories. Two distinct EEG trajectories emerged: one toward normalization and another with persistently slow, low-complexity patterns. The majority of patients did not normalize their EEG after sedation withdrawal. Notably, patients with prolonged GCSE were overrepresented in the group lacking EEG recovery. However, these trajectories could not be correlated with functional prognosis. These findings underscore the potential of early EEG trajectories as markers of cerebral recovery. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We studied how brain activity changes after stopping the sedative propofol in adults treated for severe, long-lasting seizures. Most patients showed little improvement in their brain activity after sedation was stopped, while a smaller group showed signs of recovery. Patients whose seizures lasted longer were more likely to have little or no improvement in their brain activity patterns. These early brain activity patterns did not predict long-term functional outcomes but may help identify how the brain is recovering after severe seizures.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectroencephalographyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolStatus EpilepticusSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesPropofolEEG trajectoryfunctional prognosisgeneralized convulsive status epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID41795786
PMCPMC13052051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.