ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
Influence of Ocular Biometric Parameters on IOL Power Calculation Accuracy in Short and Normal Axial Length Eyes.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of including lens thickness (LT) in modern intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and evaluate the influence of ocular biometric parameters on IOL power calculation accuracy in short and normal axial length (AL) eyes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 174 eyes (74 short AL < 22 mm, 100 normal AL 22-24 mm). Preoperative biometry was obtained using IOLMaster 700. Predicted refractions were calculated using SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formulas, with and without LT. Spearman correlation and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify biometric predictors of refractive error.
resultsShort eyes had significantly shallower anterior chamber depth (ACD), smaller white-to-white (WTW), thicker LT, and higher mean keratometry (Km) and corneal astigmatism (CA) (all p < 0.01). No significant differences in mean absolute error (MAE) were detected between most formula pairs after adjustment in either subgroup. LT inclusion resulted in a less myopic mean prediction error in both subgroups (all p < 0.01), but MAE improvements were only seen in normal eyes (p < 0.05). AL and WTW were consistent predictors of absolute prediction error (APE) overall, with shorter AL and smaller WTW associated with greater APE. In short eyes, AL showed the strongest association with APE, whereas in normal eyes, WTW was most strongly correlated with APE.
conclusionsShort eyes exhibited greater biometric variability. Incorporation of LT improved the overall prediction accuracy of modern IOL formulas, particularly in normal AL eyes. AL and WTW were the most influential biometric factors affecting refractive prediction outcomes.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR2600116749; retrospectively registered on 14 January 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.