ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Lorazepam or IVIg Versus no Treatment for Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune dysregulation in children with Down syndrome: clinical implications and emerging therapies.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDown syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is manifested by acute or subacute onset of bradykinesia, catatonia, mutism, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Both benzodiazepines and immunotherapy have been effective in treating DSRD, although no study has compared these treatments directly. This observational study compares the response of lorazepam and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to no therapy over 6 months.
methodsThis prospective, non-randomized, observational natural history study assessed therapeutic responses in 212 patients meeting international criteria for DSRD. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks using the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), 25-foot walk (25FW), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Total (NPIT) and Severity (NPIST) scores. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine changes in outcomes.
resultsPatients received lorazepam (n = 85, 40%), IVIg (n = 68, 32%) or no therapy (n = 59, 28%). By 12 weeks, both active therapies outperformed no therapy on all outcomes (all p < 0.001), with IVIg showing additional advantages over lorazepam on BFCRS [mean difference (95% CI): - 2.24 (- 3.72, - 0.75)], NPIT [- 9.22 (- 11.22, - 7.23)], and NPIST [- 3.16 (- 4.07, - 2.26)]. By 24 weeks, IVIg was superior to lorazepam on all outcomes [25FW: - 1.80 (- 2.58, - 1.02); BFCRS: - 7.09 (- 8.58, - 5.60); CGI-S: - 0.63 (- 1.01, - 0.25); NPIT: - 12.23 (- 14.22, - 10.23); NPIST: - 3.80 (- 4.71, - 2.89)]. Treatment response varied by lumbar puncture abnormality (BFCRS), any neurodiagnostic study abnormality (CGI-S, NPIT), and serum cytokines and MRI abnormality (NPIT), with IVIg demonstrating greater benefits among patients with such abnormalities.
conclusionsAt the endpoint of 24 weeks, both IVIg and lorazepam were superior to no treatment for DSRD but IVIg was superior to lorazepam for all five outcomes. Between 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, IVIg showed greater improvement in all outcomes than did lorazepam, suggesting that at least a 24-week treatment course is necessary for maximum IVIg benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.