ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Comparative genomic landscape of primary and metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma in a large-scale cohort.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma has poor survival, and large comparative genomic studies using uniform targeted sequencing of paired primary and metastatic lesions remain limited. We compared gene- and pathway-level alterations between primary and metastatic tumors
methodsWe analyzed 2,880 bladder urothelial carcinoma samples (2,305 primary; 575 metastatic) from 2,343 patients profiled with MSK-IMPACT. Somatic mutations and copy number alterations were integrated per gene and compared between primary and metastatic samples in the full cohort and in a paired subset using standard statistical tests.
resultsPrimary and metastatic samples showed broadly similar driver landscapes. In the full cohort, KDM6A, FGFR3, STAG2, and ERCC2 were more frequently altered in primary tumors, whereas no individual genes were enriched in metastases; these differences were not significant in paired analyses. At the pathway level, TP53 pathway alterations were relatively more frequent in metastases, while DNA damage response alterations were enriched in primary tumors; other pathways showed comparable alteration rates. Apoptosis-focused analyses identified no significant gene-level differences, but suggested a trend toward higher alteration rates in the TP53 pathway and apoptosis regulators in metastases.
conclusionPrimary and metastatic lesions of bladder urothelial carcinoma show broadly similar gene- and pathway-level alteration profiles on targeted DNA sequencing. TP53 pathway and apoptosis-related alterations are modestly more frequent in metastases, consistent with impaired stress responses and apoptosis evasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.