ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Validation of the 9th Edition of the UICC TNM classification and the prognostic impact of nodal spread in salivary gland cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 9th edition of the UICC TNM classification redefined N categories and clinical stages for salivary gland cancer (SGC). We validated the prognostic utility of this redefinition and evaluated the impact of anatomical nodal spread.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 166 patients with SGC and 93 parotid gland cancer (PGC) patients treated with curative surgery. Cases were restaged according to the TNM classification of the UICC 9th edition. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox models, and statistical indices (AIC, likelihood ratio χ
resultsKaplan-Meier curves showed clearer separation by N category and clinical stage for the 9th edition, although its prognostic performance by statistical indices was similar to that of the 8th edition. In the PGC surgery subset, LN metastasis, particularly N2 in the 9th edition, was the strongest adverse prognostic factor, and the new 9th edition pathological N categories were also useful. Additionally, prognosis worsened with increasing nodal extent. Twelve patients with metastases beyond levels I-III developed distant metastases despite standard treatment, and 10 with salivary duct carcinoma, indicating potential benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy.
conclusionsKaplan-Meier analyses suggested that the 9th edition provided better intercategory discrimination than the 8th edition, despite no statistical superiority being demonstrated. Nodal metastasis extending beyond levels I-III may be a useful biomarker for selecting patients for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41795756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.