Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41795745›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Underutilization of Genetic Counseling and Germline Testing Following Abnormal Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer.

Qusai Al Zureikat, Ruben Alberto Hiraldo, Samuel Speizman, Ahmad Ahmad, Rashmi Samdani, Priyanka Kanth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qusai Al ZureikatDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health-Georgetown/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. qzureikat@gmail.com.
Ruben Alberto HiraldoDepartment of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Samuel SpeizmanGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Ahmad AhmadDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health-Georgetown/Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Rashmi SamdaniDepartment of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Priyanka KanthDivision of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess referral patterns for genetic counseling among colorectal cancer patients with MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 or MSH6 loss, evaluate the completion rates of germline genetic testing in eligible patients, and identify barriers to genetic evaluation in this population.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with CRC who demonstrated loss of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6 expression on MMR immunohistochemistry between January 2022 and December 2024 across a large healthcare system. In cases with MLH1 loss, reflex tumor testing for BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was used to exclude likely sporadic etiologies. Patients with BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 63 patients eligible for genetic counseling referral. Data collected included demographic characteristics, MMR protein status, site of care (university or community), referral to genetic counseling, completion of germline testing, and documented barriers to referral or follow-through.

resultsAmong the 63 eligible patients, the mean age was 69.8 years, and 55.6% were female. The cohort included 60.3% White, 30.2% African American, and 9.5% Asian patients. A total of 36.5% were seen at a university hospital and 63.5% at community hospitals. In adjusted analyses, patient age was the only characteristic significantly associated with referral, with patients aged ≤60 years more likely to be referred than older patients. Despite meeting eligibility, only 38% of patients were referred for genetic counseling. Of those referred, 54.2% completed germline testing, representing 20.6% of the total cohort. The most common barrier was lack of provider referral, affecting 63% of patients.

conclusionsDespite clear eligibility criteria, fewer than 40% of patients were referred to genetic counseling, and only one in five completed germline testing. The most significant barrier was the lack of provider referral. These findings highlight the need for system-level interventions, including automated referrals, improved communication tools, and navigation support to ensure access to genetic services.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingAgedAged, 80 and overDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsG-T mismatch-binding proteinMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinPMS2 protein, humanColorectal cancerGenetic counselingGermline testingLynch syndromeMismatch repair deficiencyMLH1/PMS2 loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.