ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Underutilization of Genetic Counseling and Germline Testing Following Abnormal Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to assess referral patterns for genetic counseling among colorectal cancer patients with MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 or MSH6 loss, evaluate the completion rates of germline genetic testing in eligible patients, and identify barriers to genetic evaluation in this population.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with CRC who demonstrated loss of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6 expression on MMR immunohistochemistry between January 2022 and December 2024 across a large healthcare system. In cases with MLH1 loss, reflex tumor testing for BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was used to exclude likely sporadic etiologies. Patients with BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 63 patients eligible for genetic counseling referral. Data collected included demographic characteristics, MMR protein status, site of care (university or community), referral to genetic counseling, completion of germline testing, and documented barriers to referral or follow-through.
resultsAmong the 63 eligible patients, the mean age was 69.8 years, and 55.6% were female. The cohort included 60.3% White, 30.2% African American, and 9.5% Asian patients. A total of 36.5% were seen at a university hospital and 63.5% at community hospitals. In adjusted analyses, patient age was the only characteristic significantly associated with referral, with patients aged ≤60 years more likely to be referred than older patients. Despite meeting eligibility, only 38% of patients were referred for genetic counseling. Of those referred, 54.2% completed germline testing, representing 20.6% of the total cohort. The most common barrier was lack of provider referral, affecting 63% of patients.
conclusionsDespite clear eligibility criteria, fewer than 40% of patients were referred to genetic counseling, and only one in five completed germline testing. The most significant barrier was the lack of provider referral. These findings highlight the need for system-level interventions, including automated referrals, improved communication tools, and navigation support to ensure access to genetic services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41795745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.