ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2026
Effects of Intracellular Force Localization on Cancer Cell Invasion: Revealing Mechanical Trade-offs through Experimentally Validated Computational Models.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastasis, leading to 90% of cancer-related deaths, is driven by invasive forces exerted by cancer cells on their microenvironment. While actin is central to force generation and motility, the effects of intracellular force-localization during invasion remain largely unexplored. We previously demonstrated, in a clinically relevant assay, invasive cancer cells indenting soft, elastic gels to cell-scale depths, and developed corresponding experimentally validated finite element models. Here, we applied those models to investigate how the force-application location, above (top) or below (bottom) the nucleus, affects invasion efficiency. Under low force-levels (≤100 nN), top-applied forces produce 35-42% deeper indentations than bottom-applied forces, with modest increases in intracellular stress, indicating potentially increased invasiveness. However, with top-applied forces, ∼10% less stress is transmitted to the gel, suggesting less effective microenvironmental mechanical interaction. In contrast, under higher forces (≥150 nN), bottom-applied forces become more effective, transmitting >15% more stress to the gel, with indentation depths becoming comparable between top- and bottom-applied configurations, and significantly (>250%) less nuclear stress generated, thereby supporting invasion. These trends are particularly evident when the cytoplasm is softer than the nucleus, as is typical of (invasive cancer) cells. Thus, top-applied forces may support shallow invasion into soft environments, whereas bottom-applied forces mimicking actin-rich, stiff, leading-edge protrusions, optimize deep, forceful invasion with reduced cell-integrity risk. We demonstrate that intracellular force-localization critically influences the mechanical trade-offs between invasion efficiency and cellular stability, potentially offering targets for antimetastatic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.