ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
A novel eye-tracking digital marker outperforms plasma biomarkers in detecting cognitive impairment.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Digital eye tracking and plasma biomarkers: Distinguishing functional cognitive impairment from Alzheimer's disease biology".Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Digital eye tracking and plasma biomarkers: Distinguishing functional cognitive impairment from Alzheimer's disease biology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDetecting and monitoring cognitive performance in older adults is critical. In this study, we evaluated the validity of an eye-tracking tool in diagnosing cognitive impairment.
methodsWe recruited 119 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals and 157 cognitively impaired (CI) patients who completed digital eye-tracking tests and cognitive scales. Of them, 154, 120, 53, and 146 underwent plasma biomarker tests, amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scans, tau-PET scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The diagnostic performance of eye-tracking markers and their relationships to Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and cognition were examined.
resultsThe eye-tracking panel exhibited better performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.865) in classifying CI from CU compared to plasma Aβ DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrate the validity of digital eye-tracking markers for screening patients with cognitive impairment, providing a novel digital marker for detecting cognitive decline in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.