ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Finding Significant Hits in Networks: a network-based tool for analyzing gene-level P-values to identify significant genes missed by standard methods.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph in Graph (GiG): A novel graph AI framework for integrating and interpreting medical and omics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Combining Motifs, CRE Activity, And Gene Expression Data Using ML Greatly Improves the Accuracy of Tissue-Specific TF Network Maps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finding Significant Hits in Networks (FISHNET) uses prior biological knowledge, represented as gene interaction networks and gene function annotations, to identify genes that do not meet the genome-wide significance threshold but replicate, nonetheless. Its input is gene-level P-values from any source, including omicsWAS, aggregation of genome-wide association studies P-values, CRISPR screens, or differential expression analysis. It is based on the idea that genes whose P-values are low purely by chance are distributed randomly across networks and functions, so genes with suggestive P-values that cluster in densely connected subnetworks and share common functions are less likely to reflect chance and more likely to replicate. FISHNET combines network and function analysis with permutation-based P-value thresholds to identify a small set of exceptional genes that we call FISHNET genes. Applied to 11 cardiovascular risk traits, FISHNET identified 19 gene-trait relationships that missed genome-wide significance thresholds but, nonetheless, replicated in an independent cohort. The replication rate of FISHNET genes matched that of genes with lower P-values. FISHNET identified a novel association between RUNX1 expression and HDL that is supported by experimental evidence that RUNX1 promotes white fat browning, which increases HDL cholesterol levels. FISHNET also identified an association between LTB expression and BMI that is supported by experimental evidence that higher LTB expression increases BMI via activation of the LTβR pathway. Both associations failed genome-wide significance thresholds, highlighting FISHNET's ability to uncover meaningful relationships missed by traditional methods. FISHNET software is freely available at https://brentlab.github.io/fishnet/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.