ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Bridging the gap: Translating fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging insights into clinical practice.
Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Highlights from the 2024 annual meeting of the fetal, infant, and Toddler Neuroimaging Group (FIT'NG).Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, fetal, infant, and toddler (FIT) neuroimaging has become a rapidly expanding field, driven by advances in technology and computational methods. By providing non-invasive ways to explore the developing brain in both typical and pathological development, FIT neuroimaging holds promise for advancing pediatric medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, and electroencephalography (EEG) are regularly used in clinical practice to identify or rule out structural brain abnormalities; monitor the timing and evolution of brain injuries; assess brain growth and maturation; diagnose and monitor seizures, including infantile spasms; and facilitate pre-surgical planning. Other methods, including functional MRI, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), provide information about brain function but have not yet been considered standard-of-care. As the field has rapidly advanced, numerous barriers (e.g., concerns regarding cost-effectiveness, safety, availability and portability, bedside applicability, suitability for serial imaging, and uncertain predictive utility) have hindered the routine use of neuroimaging techniques. This review focuses on how FIT neuroimaging research can be applied beyond academic settings to improve outcomes in clinical environments, such as high-risk follow-up programs and neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Key topics include: (1) how FIT neuroimaging can advance pediatric medicine; (2) challenges and gaps in translating FIT neuroimaging to clinical practice; (3) proposed strategies for bridging these gaps; and (4) a framework for clinical translation and future directions to enhance pediatric healthcare and developmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.