SynthesisSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Built environment features: Predictors or effect modifiers of post-disaster mental health outcomes? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging research has examined the mental health impact of built environment features in the context of climate disasters; however, evidence remains fragmented and heterogeneous. While existing reviews have synthesized particular built environment characteristics such as greenspace and housing under extreme weather events, a comprehensive synthesis examining diverse built environment features in relation to disaster-related mental health outcomes is lacking. This systematic review synthesized empirical evidence to assess these associations and identify research gaps and priorities for future study. Drawing upon seven electronic databases: Web of Science, Medline, ProQuest, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Environmental Complete and following PRISMA guidelines, this review identified a final set of 22 articles. Almost half of the included studies were published between 2020 and 2024; most were cross-sectional studies conducted in the United States. Overall, the association of built environment features with mental health has been examined in diverse disasters, such as hurricanes, drought, heatwaves, and floods. Mental health assessments have focused on a range of outcomes, notably PTSD and psychological distress. We identified 12 studies that examined the role of built environment features in predicting climate disaster-related mental health outcomes, considering urbanicity, land cover, housing type, and characteristics of neighborhood vulnerability. Ten studies examined the role of four features in modifying the direction and strength of the relationship between climate disasters and mental health, namely urbanicity, land cover, neighborhood deprivation, and sky view factor. The synthesized evidence provides new insights into the psychological effect of built environments and policy implications for disaster preparedness and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.