ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2026
Screening of binding by antidiabetic drugs to normal vs AGE-modified human serum albumin through covalent immobilization and microscale affinity chromatography.
Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microscale affinity chromatography (μAC) was used with covalent protein immobilization and zonal elution to quickly screen and compare binding by several sulfonylurea-based antidiabetic drugs with human serum albumin (HSA) and forms of this protein containing advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). The HSA was modified with glyoxal or methylglyoxal and examined for its binding to the following drugs: acetohexamide, chlorpropamide, gliclazide, glipizide, tolbutamide, and tolazamide. The HSA was coupled by the Schiff base method onto HPLC-grade silica, which was then placed into 10 mm × 2.1 mm i.d. affinity microcolumns. These microcolumns each contained ∼1 mg HSA and could be used for over 450-500 sample injections. The drugs were injected onto these microcolumns at 37 °C and pH 7.4, giving retention data at 0.50 mL/min within a few minutes (e.g., less than 5 min for normal HSA). The overall binding constants obtained for normal and AGE-modified HSA were consistent with the literature, showing a strong correlation with prior values estimated when using immunoaffinity chromatography and the biospecific adsorption of HSA. These results indicated that μAC combined with zonal elution screening and Schiff base immobilization was an effective approach for studying the interactions of sulfonylurea drugs with HSA and modified forms of this protein. This approach can be extended to other proteins and drug-protein interactions, as could be used for fundamental research or aid in the development of new treatments through personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.