ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Automated Segmentation of Augmented Bone After Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation Using Deep Learning.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning models for segmenting the augmented bone following transalveolar sinus floor elevation (TSFE). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data from 103 patients undergoing TSFE, acquired at preoperative (T0) and immediate postoperative (T1) were retrospectively analysed. Four deep learning models (UNETR++, Swin Transformer, U-Net, 3D-VNet) were trained and validated for segmenting the augmented bone. Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU), sensitivity, precision, 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and accuracy. UNETR++ demonstrated the best performance, with an average DSC of 0.8477, IoU of 0.7356, sensitivity of 0.8337, precision of 0.8622, HD95 of 0.9234 mm, and accuracy of 0.8730. UNETR++ segmentations exhibited excellent reproducibility compared with manual segmentation. The automated segmentation process significantly reduced measurement time to 14.96 ± 2.57 seconds. Deep learning models, particularly UNETR++, provide an accurate and efficient method for segmenting augmented bone after TSFE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.