ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Tolerability and efficacy of chemosaturation in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Metastatic disease occurs in approximately 40%-50% of patients, the liver being the predominant site of metastasis (>90%). Treatment options include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the bispecific fusion protein tebentafusp, and liver-directed therapies such as chemosaturation. Despite these available approaches, treatment remains a significant challenge, with a median overall survival of approximately 1 year. In our retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of administering systemic therapy within a defined time interval of ±40 days relative to the date of chemosaturation. Patients included had received either ICI or tebentafusp in close temporal proximity to chemosaturation between November 2023 and July 2024. Treatment efficacy was assessed based on radiologic imaging according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, and tolerability was evaluated based on documented adverse events. A total of 10 patients with hepatic metastatic UM could be included in the study. Seven patients received systemic therapy with ICI; three patients were treated with tebentafusp. Hepatic disease control was achieved in all patients. Partial response was observed in 7 of 10 patients, while 3 of 10 patients demonstrated stable disease. Chemosaturation was associated mainly with pancytopenia in 5 of 10 patients. Additionally, immune-related adverse events of common terminology criteria for adverse events grade I-III were observed. In summary, our findings suggest that administering systemic therapy within the defined interval around chemosaturation can achieve disease control with acceptable tolerability. To further evaluate this therapeutic approach, prospective controlled studies are warranted to assess efficacy and optimize patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.