ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Experience Using Efgartigimod to Treat Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsCurrent therapeutic management of juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) predominantly relies on conventional immunosuppressive therapies and expert consensus extrapolated from adult data, creating a critical gap in high-quality, pediatric-specific clinical evidence. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the pediatric population.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study enrolled JMG patients (under 18 years), from 12 Chinese centers, who received at least one dose of efgartigimod. Efgartigimod was administered as weekly intravenous infusions. Study visits included W0 (baseline: pretreatment) and W1-W4 (weekly posttreatment follow-ups). Efficacy was assessed via MG-related Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score, and the MG Composite (MGC) scale.
resultsSeventeen JMG patients (3 males, 14 females) with a median disease duration of 23 months were included. At W0, 88.2% of patients were classified as Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class II-V and were anti-acetylcholine receptor (anti-AchR) antibody positive. After efgartigimod treatment, clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) was observed in 70.6% (W1), 73% (W2), and 91.7% (W4); 66.7% achieved minimal symptom expression by W4. MG-ADL and QMG scores decreased by 30% and 30.1% (W1) and by 87.6% and 71.8% (W4) compared to W0. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests efgartigimod is an effective therapeutic option for JMG, with favorable efficacy and safety profiles. Further studies are necessary to validate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.