ArticleCancer medicine2026
Factors Associated With Inaccurate Recall of Inherited Cancer Genetic Test Results Among Individuals With Germline Pathogenic Variants.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Usability Testing of an Information Needs-Based Chatbot for Individuals With Pathogenic Variants in BRCA Genes in Korea: A Methodological Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGermline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (GPV) in cancer susceptibility genes may guide medical care. However, inaccurate recall of test results by patients may impact the uptake of appropriate medical care, underscoring the importance of accurate recall of results.
methodsAmong individuals with a confirmed cancer susceptibility GPV that alters cancer risk management, individuals were categorized based on their accuracy of recall. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine demographic and psychosocial factors associated with recall of test results.
resultsOf 807 participants, 91 (11%) failed to accurately recall their test results, including 22 who did not remember being tested and 69 whose cancer risk management could be impacted due to inaccurate recall of test result details. Compared to those with accurate recall of test results, those who failed to accurately recall their results were significantly more likely to have a history of cancer [OR = 2.24, p = 0.009] and lack a college degree [OR = 2.42, p < 0.029]. Additionally, based on standardized survey responses, failure to accurately recall was associated with positive feelings about their results [OR = 1.73, p < 0.001], lower emotional distress [OR = 0.65, p = 0.004], lower knowledge about hereditary cancer [OR = 0.67, p < 0.001], and lower satisfaction with family communication and support related to testing [OR = 0.62, p < 0.001]. Participants with GPVs in high-risk or moderate-risk breast cancer genes were substantially less likely to demonstrate inaccurate recall (both OR = 0.18, p < 0.001) compared to those with GPVs in other actionable cancer genes. DISCUSSION: Given 11% of participants failed to remember being tested or failed to accurately recall their result, this highlights the importance of documentation and accessibility of test results by both patients and providers to ensure patients receive appropriate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.