ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Clinical significance of renal histological diagnosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuria atypical for diabetic nephropathy.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimMost patients with proteinuria are considered to have typical diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, when proteinuria occurs without diabetic retinopathy, with hematuria, or persists despite strict glycemic and blood pressure control, it is considered atypical for DN and warrants further evaluation for non-DN via kidney biopsy. Nevertheless, comprehensive information on renal histopathology and prognosis following kidney biopsy remains limited. This study aimed to clarify these issues through a retrospective analysis.
methodsAmong 490 patients who underwent kidney biopsy at Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital between 2013 and 2024, 51 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who met at least one criterion for proteinuria atypical for DN were included. Pre- and post-biopsy changes in proteinuria levels and eGFR decline rate, as well as renal histology, were analyzed.
resultsAmong the 51 patients, 17 (33.3%) were histologically diagnosed with typical DN, whereas 34 (66.7%) were diagnosed with non-DN, including membranous nephropathy, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, renal sclerosis, interstitial nephritis, vasculitis, and others. Compared with the DN group, patients with non-DN were significantly older and had a lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Additionally, the non-DN group showed significant improvements in both proteinuria levels and in the eGFR decline following biopsy and appropriate disease-specific therapy.
conclusionA kidney biopsy identified a wide range of kidney diseases as the underlying causes of atypical proteinuria in DN, particularly in elderly patients, thereby improving renal outcomes. These findings underscore the clinical importance of heightened awareness of atypical proteinuria in diabetes management, particularly in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.