ArticleMolecular cancer2026
Machine learning model on multi-omics data enables risk stratification and identifies molecular heterogeneity and therapeutic targets in glioblastoma.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Omics Approaches in Hantavirus Research: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Recent applications of artificial intelligence in cancer radiotherapy and immunotherapy: current status and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal data integration reveals causal features often missed by single-modality analyses, offering a more comprehensive view of glioblastoma (GBM) complexity. We collected radiomic, pathomic, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data from patients with IDH-wild-type GBM to construct a machine learning–based risk stratification model. While sample sizes varied across modalities, 147 patients with complete data across all five omics layers were used for integrative analysis. This approach identified two clinically distinct subgroups. The low-risk group, linked to favorable outcomes, showed enhanced neurodevelopmental signatures, increased neuronal infiltration, and more oligodendrocytes. In contrast, the high-risk group, associated with poor prognosis, exhibited strong proliferative signals and hyperactive cell cycle pathways. Downstream multi-omics analysis identified PDIA4, EIF3I, and RFT1 as potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in high-risk GBM. These findings underscore the utility of multimodal machine learning in refining prognostic models, characterizing tumor heterogeneity, and informing personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.